Silniki Mitsubishi Space Runner
(Zużycie kombinowane (NEDC))| Silnik | Zużycie kombinowane (NEDC) |
|---|---|
| 2.4 GDI Cool 110 kW | 9.1 l/100km |
| 2.0 Cool 100 kW | 9.2 l/100km |
| 2.4 GDI Cool {automatic} 110 kW | 9.6 l/100km |
| 2.0 Cool {automatic} 100 kW | 10.1 l/100km |
1. 2.4 GDI Cool 110 kW
9.1 l/100km
2. 2.0 Cool 100 kW
9.2 l/100km
3. 2.4 GDI Cool {automatic} 110 kW
9.6 l/100km
4. 2.0 Cool {automatic} 100 kW
10.1 l/100km
Zużycie kombinowane (nedc) w porównaniu do innych modeli Mitsubishi
Mitsubishi Space Runner w porównaniu do innych obecnych modeli Mitsubishi
(Zużycie kombinowane (NEDC))| Nazwa wariantu | Zużycie kombinowane (NEDC) |
|---|---|
| Colt 1.6 Avance 76 kW | 6.6 l/100km |
| Space Star 1.8 GDI Avance 90 kW | 6.8 l/100km |
| Lancer 2.0 Intense 99 kW | 6.8 l/100km |
| Lancer Kombi 2.0 Intense 99 kW | 7.0 l/100km |
| Carisma {sedan} 1.8 GDI Comfort {automatic} 92 kW | 7.3 l/100km |
| Carisma 1.8 GDI Comfort {automatic} 92 kW | 7.4 l/100km |
| Outlander 2.0 Turbo 4WD 148 kW | 9.1 l/100km |
| Space Runner 2.4 GDI Cool 110 kW | 9.2 l/100km |
| Pajero Pinin 2.0 GDI 95 kW | 9.3 l/100km |
| Galant Limousine Kombi 2.0 Elegance {automatic} 98 kW | 9.4 l/100km |
| Galant Kombi Kombi 2.0 Elegance {automatic} 98 kW | 9.6 l/100km |
| Space Wagon 2.4 GDI Avance 110 kW | 9.6 l/100km |
| Eclipse 2000-16V GS 107 kW | 9.7 l/100km |
| L400 Kombi 64 kW | 10.1 l/100km |
| Pajero 3.5 GDI Elegance 149 kW | 10.3 l/100km |
| Pajero Classic 2.5 TD 85 kW | 10.4 l/100km |
| Lancer Evo VIII lution VIII 195 kW | 10.9 l/100km |
| 3000 GT 210kW 1995 (m) 210 kW | 12.4 l/100km |
| Pajero Sport 3.0 V6 GLS 130 kW | 13.2 l/100km |
1. Colt 1.6 Avance 76 kW
6.6 l/100km
2. Space Star 1.8 GDI Avance 90 kW
6.8 l/100km
3. Lancer 2.0 Intense 99 kW
6.8 l/100km
4. Lancer Kombi 2.0 Intense 99 kW
7.0 l/100km
6. Carisma 1.8 GDI Comfort {automatic} 92 kW
7.4 l/100km
7. Outlander 2.0 Turbo 4WD 148 kW
9.1 l/100km
8. Space Runner 2.4 GDI Cool 110 kW
9.2 l/100km
9. Pajero Pinin 2.0 GDI 95 kW
9.3 l/100km
12. Space Wagon 2.4 GDI Avance 110 kW
9.6 l/100km
13. Eclipse 2000-16V GS 107 kW
9.7 l/100km
14. L400 Kombi 64 kW
10.1 l/100km
15. Pajero 3.5 GDI Elegance 149 kW
10.3 l/100km
16. Pajero Classic 2.5 TD 85 kW
10.4 l/100km
17. Lancer Evo VIII lution VIII 195 kW
10.9 l/100km
18. 3000 GT 210kW 1995 (m) 210 kW
12.4 l/100km
19. Pajero Sport 3.0 V6 GLS 130 kW
13.2 l/100km
Jak zużycie kombinowane (nedc) modelu Mitsubishi Space Runner wypada w porównaniu do najbliższych konkurentów?
Mitsubishi Space Runner vs. podobne samochody
(Zużycie kombinowane (NEDC))| Model samochodu | Zużycie kombinowane (NEDC) |
|---|---|
| Ford EcoSport 1.0 EcoBoost 2017 | 5.2 l/100km |
| KIA Stonic 1.2 2017 | 5.2 l/100km |
| VW Touran 1.2 TSI BMT 2015 | 5.5 l/100km |
| Renault Scénic ENERGY TCe 115 2016 | 5.8 l/100km |
| Ford Transit Courier Kombi 1.0 EcoBoost 2018 | 5.8 l/100km |
| Fiat Fiorino Kombi 1.4 8V 2016 | 6.9 l/100km |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner 2.0 1999 | 9.2 l/100km |
1. Ford EcoSport 1.0 EcoBoost 2017
5.2 l/100km
2. KIA Stonic 1.2 2017
5.2 l/100km
3. VW Touran 1.2 TSI BMT 2015
5.5 l/100km
4. Renault Scénic ENERGY TCe 115 2016
5.8 l/100km
5. Ford Transit Courier Kombi 1.0 EcoBoost 2018
5.8 l/100km
6. Fiat Fiorino Kombi 1.4 8V 2016
6.9 l/100km
7. Mitsubishi Space Runner 2.0 1999
9.2 l/100km
